Donald Trump Instructs Administration to Collaborate With Congress to Pass New Legislation to Counter Supreme Court’s Ruling After Court Declares $10 Billion DHS Expansion Unconstitutional, Following Partisan 220-207 House Vote which is against his ICE Agents Ambitions

Donald Trump Directs Administration to Work With Congress After Supreme Court Blocks $10 Billion DHS Expansion

Former President Donald Trump has instructed his administration’s policy and legislative teams to begin working closely with Congress on new legislation aimed at countering a recent Supreme Court ruling that struck down a proposed $10 billion expansion of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), a plan closely tied to his long-standing ambition to dramatically expand Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The Supreme Court’s decision declared the DHS expansion unconstitutional, dealing a significant blow to efforts to rapidly scale up ICE funding, staffing, and operational authority. The ruling came just days after a razor-thin and deeply partisan House vote of 220–207, in which a coalition of Republicans and a small number of Democrats pushed the measure through, highlighting the intense political divisions surrounding immigration enforcement and executive authority.

A Direct Response to the Court

In a statement released following the ruling, Trump criticized the Supreme Court’s decision as “judicial overreach” and argued that it undermines the federal government’s ability to secure the nation’s borders. He directed administration officials to immediately engage lawmakers to craft legislation that would survive constitutional scrutiny while still advancing what he described as “critical national security priorities.”

According to senior aides, the new legislative push will focus on restructuring the funding mechanism, narrowing the scope of executive discretion, and explicitly grounding DHS and ICE expansion powers in congressional authorization—key issues raised by the Court in its opinion.

ICE at the Center of the Fight

ICE has long been central to Trump’s immigration agenda, with repeated calls during his presidency for more agents, broader enforcement powers, and increased detention capacity. The blocked $10 billion package would have represented one of the largest single expansions of the agency in U.S. history.

Opponents of the measure argue that the plan went far beyond funding, effectively granting the executive branch sweeping authority without adequate oversight. Civil liberties groups and several lawmakers praised the Supreme Court’s ruling, saying it reaffirmed constitutional limits on executive power and protected Congress’s role in controlling federal spending.

Congressional Battle Ahead

The House vote that preceded the Court’s decision underscored how contentious the issue remains. While supporters framed the expansion as essential to border security and immigration enforcement, critics warned it would lead to abuses, increased detentions, and erosion of due process.

With Trump now urging a legislative workaround, Congress is bracing for another high-stakes battle. Lawmakers from both parties have signaled that any new bill will face intense scrutiny, particularly as election-season politics amplify debates over immigration, federal authority, and the balance of power between the branches of government.

What Comes Next

Whether Trump’s strategy succeeds will depend on his ability to unite a fractured Congress behind a revised proposal that satisfies constitutional requirements without alienating moderates or energizing opposition. For now, the Supreme Court’s ruling stands as a significant check on his ICE-focused ambitions—and a reminder that even narrowly won votes in Congress may not be enough without firm constitutional footing.

As negotiations begin, the clash between the executive branch, Congress, and the judiciary is set to continue, placing immigration policy once again at the center of America’s political and legal landscape.