Colombian President Gustavo Petro Demands The Hague CRIMINALLY PROSECUTE Donald Trump Over Alleged Caribbean Sea Crimes

BREAKING: Colombian President Calls for International Criminal Investigation Into Donald Trump, Igniting Global Political Firestorm

A major international controversy erupted after Colombian President Gustavo Petro publicly called on legal authorities in The Hague to begin a criminal investigation into former U.S. President Donald Trump, accusing him of alleged crimes connected to actions in the Caribbean Sea.

In a move that has stunned diplomats and lawmakers alike, Petro framed his demand as a test of whether international law applies equally to powerful nations and leaders, warning that global justice risks becoming meaningless if it only targets weaker states.

“International law cannot be selective,” Petro said, according to statements circulated by Colombian officials. “If crimes were committed in the Caribbean Sea, they must be investigated — regardless of who ordered them.”

A Direct Challenge to U.S. Power

Petro’s call is being widely interpreted as one of the boldest challenges by a Latin American leader against a former U.S. president in modern history. By invoking The Hague — home to the International Criminal Court (ICC) — Petro has pushed the controversy beyond diplomacy and into the realm of international criminal accountability.

While the exact allegations have not yet been detailed in a formal filing, Petro’s remarks suggest claims involving military, security, or enforcement actions in international waters, raising questions about jurisdiction, sovereignty, and the limits of presidential power.

Trump Camp Dismisses Accusations

Allies of Donald Trump swiftly rejected the claims, calling them “politically motivated,” “reckless,” and “baseless.” Supporters argue that the ICC lacks authority over U.S. citizens and accuse Petro of attempting to score political points by targeting a polarizing global figure.

Trump himself has not yet issued a direct response, but sources close to him say he views the move as an attack on American sovereignty rather than a legitimate legal action.

Can The Hague Act?

Legal experts caution that calling for an investigation does not mean one will happen. The United States is not a member of the ICC, and any attempt to pursue a case involving a former U.S. president would face enormous legal and political obstacles.

Still, Petro’s demand alone is enough to shake international norms, forcing conversations about accountability, double standards, and whether global justice systems can ever truly confront powerful Western leaders.

A Symbolic Moment With Real Consequences

Even if no case ultimately moves forward, analysts say the moment is significant. It reflects growing frustration among Global South nations over what they see as unequal enforcement of international law, and it places renewed pressure on institutions like the ICC to prove their independence.

As reactions pour in from Washington, Latin America, and Europe, one thing is clear:

Gustavo Petro has ignited a global debate — and Donald Trump is now at the center of it.