BREAKING: Former President Barack Obama Files $10 Billion Defamation Lawsuit Against Donald Trump for Reposting AI-Generated Video Falsely Depicting His Arrest, Also Targets Tulsi Gabbard with $50 Million Suit for False Allegations and Defamation of Character

Barack Obama Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against Trump, $50 Million Against Gabbard Over AI Video and Defamation Claims

Washington, D.C., July 21, 2025 – Former President Barack Obama has launched a legal firestorm, filing a staggering $10 billion defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump and a $50 million suit against former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard. The lawsuits, filed in federal court, center on allegations of malicious defamation stemming from Trump’s reposting of an AI-generated video falsely depicting Obama’s arrest and Gabbard’s alleged spread of slanderous falsehoods aimed at tarnishing his reputation.

The Trump Lawsuit: A $10 Billion Battle Over an AI Video

At the heart of Obama’s legal action against Trump is a viral AI-generated video that falsely portrays the former president being arrested in a dramatic, fabricated scene. The video, which spread rapidly across social media platforms, was reposted by Trump, who has not publicly commented on its authenticity. Obama’s legal team argues that the video, clearly manipulated through advanced artificial intelligence, was designed to deceive the public and inflict severe reputational harm.

“This AI-crafted falsehood is not just a prank; it’s a deliberate attempt to smear President Obama’s character and undermine his legacy,” said lead attorney Robert Barnett in a press conference. “By reposting this malicious content, Mr. Trump amplified its reach, causing irreparable damage to President Obama’s public image and personal dignity.”

The $10 billion claim seeks damages for defamation, emotional distress, and the costs associated with countering the widespread misinformation. Legal experts note that the unprecedented sum reflects the gravity of the harm caused by the video’s viral spread, particularly given Trump’s massive online following. The lawsuit accuses Trump of acting with “reckless disregard for the truth,” alleging that he knowingly or negligently shared the fabricated content to incite controversy and damage Obama’s standing.

The Gabbard Lawsuit: $50 Million for Alleged Slander

In a parallel legal action, Obama is suing Tulsi Gabbard, the former Democratic congresswoman and 2020 presidential candidate, for $50 million, alleging defamation through a series of false and harmful statements. The lawsuit claims Gabbard propagated baseless accusations that attacked Obama’s character, including assertions of misconduct that Obama’s attorneys describe as “perjurious fabrications” intended to vilify him.

While the specific statements attributed to Gabbard have not been fully detailed in court filings, sources close to the case suggest they involve inflammatory remarks made during recent public appearances and on social media. The lawsuit contends that Gabbard’s actions were part of a coordinated effort to undermine Obama’s legacy and fuel political division.

“Ms. Gabbard’s reckless and slanderous claims have caused significant harm to President Obama’s reputation and standing in the public eye,” the filing states. “Such falsehoods, spread with malicious intent, cannot go unanswered.”

The Broader Context: AI, Defamation, and Political Rivalries

The lawsuits come at a time when deepfake technology and AI-generated content are raising alarm bells about misinformation in the digital age. The video at the center of the Trump lawsuit highlights the growing challenge of combating fabricated media, which can spread rapidly and influence public perception. Legal scholars suggest that Obama’s case could set a precedent for how courts handle defamation involving AI-generated content, particularly when amplified by high-profile figures.

The Gabbard lawsuit, meanwhile, underscores ongoing tensions within political circles, where personal attacks and inflammatory rhetoric have become increasingly common. Gabbard, who has positioned herself as an independent voice critical of establishment figures, has not yet publicly responded to the lawsuit. Her history of controversial statements, including critiques of Democratic Party leaders, may provide context for the allegations, though Obama’s team insists her claims crossed a legal line into defamation.

Reactions and Implications

The lawsuits have sparked intense debate across the political spectrum. Supporters of Obama argue that the legal actions are a necessary stand against the rising tide of misinformation and character assassination in politics. Critics, however, claim the suits are an attempt to silence free speech and could set a dangerous precedent for political discourse.

On social media platforms like X, reactions are polarized. Some users praise Obama for taking a stand against what they call “digital lies,” while others accuse him of overreaching with the massive damage claims. “This is about accountability, not censorship,” one X user posted. Another countered, “Suing for billions over a video? That’s a power move to shut down critics.”

Legal analysts predict a contentious battle ahead, with both cases likely to hinge on proving intent and actual harm. For Trump, the question will be whether his reposting of the AI video constitutes reckless or malicious defamation. For Gabbard, the challenge will be demonstrating that her statements fall under protected speech or were based on verifiable facts.

Obama’s Legacy and the Stakes

For Barack Obama, these lawsuits represent more than a personal defense; they are a bid to protect his legacy as a transformative figure in American politics. As the first Black president, Obama has long been a lightning rod for criticism, but his legal team argues that the actions of Trump and Gabbard crossed a line into deliberate and harmful falsehoods.

“President Obama has spent his career advocating for unity and truth,” said Barnett. “These lawsuits are about holding accountable those who seek to divide and deceive for their own gain.”

Neither Trump nor Gabbard has issued a formal response to the lawsuits as of this writing, though sources indicate both are preparing robust defenses. Trump’s legal team is expected to argue that his reposting of the video was an exercise of free speech, while Gabbard may claim her statements were opinions rather than defamatory assertions.

What’s Next?

The cases are expected to draw significant attention as they move through the courts, with potential implications for how defamation, free speech, and AI-generated content are treated under U.S. law. Discovery processes could reveal more details about the origins of the AI video and the context of Gabbard’s statements, potentially escalating the public feud.

For now, Obama’s lawsuits signal a bold stance against what he perceives as coordinated attacks on his character. Whether the courts will agree—and whether the massive damage claims will hold up—remains to be seen. As the legal battles unfold, they are sure to fuel debates about truth, technology, and the boundaries of political discourse in an increasingly divided nation.