BREAKING: President Donald Trump’s Truth Social Tirade Targets Rosie O’Donnell and Elon Musk, Proposing Citizenship Revocation for Alleged Harm to National Well-Being

Trump’s Truth Social Post Proposing Citizenship Revocation for Rosie O’Donnell and Elon Musk Sparks Outrage and Legal Questions

Washington, D.C., July 12, 2025 – President Donald Trump has once again ignited a firestorm of controversy with a provocative post on Truth Social, where he suggested revoking the U.S. citizenship of comedian Rosie O’Donnell and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. In the post, Trump claimed that both individuals are “not in the best interest of the country,” prompting widespread debate, outrage, and questions about the legal and political implications of such a proposal.

The Truth Social Post

Late Friday evening, President Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to express his latest grievances. In a series of posts, he singled out O’Donnell, a long-time critic with whom he has had public feuds spanning decades, and Musk, the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, whose relationship with Trump has been a rollercoaster of public support and occasional friction. The key post read:

“Rosie O’Donnell and Elon Musk are a danger to our great country. They spread lies and hurt America’s interests. I’m seriously considering revoking their citizenship to protect the USA! We need loyalty to our nation, not chaos. #MAGA”

The statement, devoid of specific evidence or detailed accusations, quickly spread across social media platforms, drawing sharp reactions from supporters, critics, and legal experts alike.

A History of Feuds

Trump’s targeting of Rosie O’Donnell is rooted in a well-documented history of animosity. The feud began in the early 2000s when O’Donnell, a former talk show host, publicly criticized Trump’s business dealings and personal conduct. The tension escalated over the years, with Trump frequently using derogatory language to describe O’Donnell on social media and in interviews. O’Donnell has been equally vocal, often calling out Trump’s policies and behavior during his political career.

The inclusion of Elon Musk, however, has raised eyebrows, given Musk’s complex relationship with Trump. Musk, a naturalized U.S. citizen born in South Africa, has at times praised Trump’s policies, particularly on deregulation and economic growth. However, recent reports suggest tensions over Musk’s influence in political and technological spheres, including his push for autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligence, may have strained their rapport. Trump’s post did not specify what actions by Musk prompted the citizenship revocation proposal, leaving many to speculate about the motivations behind the statement.

Legal and Constitutional Concerns

Legal scholars were quick to point out the significant hurdles to revoking U.S. citizenship. Under the 14th Amendment, anyone born in the United States, like O’Donnell, is a natural-born citizen, and the Supreme Court has historically protected such citizenship from arbitrary revocation. In the landmark 1967 case Afroyim v. Rusk, the Court ruled that Congress cannot revoke citizenship without an individual’s voluntary renunciation, except in rare cases involving fraud or illegal procurement of citizenship.

Musk, as a naturalized citizen, could theoretically face denaturalization proceedings, but only under specific circumstances, such as evidence of fraud during the naturalization process. Legal experts, including Georgetown University law professor David Cole, have called Trump’s proposal “constitutionally dubious and practically unfeasible.” In a statement to CNN, Cole noted, “Citizenship is a fundamental right, not a privilege to be stripped at a president’s whim. This is political theater, not policy.”

The Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security, which oversee citizenship matters, have not issued official statements in response to Trump’s post. However, sources within the administration suggest that the proposal is unlikely to move forward as formal policy, given the legal complexities and political backlash.

Public and Political Reactions

The reaction to Trump’s Truth Social post was swift and polarized. Supporters of the president rallied behind the statement, with some posting on X that O’Donnell’s outspoken criticism and Musk’s globalist ventures justify extreme measures. One X user wrote, “Trump’s right! We need to protect America from those who undermine it. Rosie and Elon don’t get a free pass!” Others in the MAGA base echoed Trump’s call for “loyalty,” framing the proposal as a bold move to restore national unity.

Conversely, critics decried the statement as an attack on free speech and democratic principles. O’Donnell responded on her own social media, calling the proposal “unhinged” and “a desperate attempt to silence dissent.” Musk, known for his active presence on X, posted a cryptic response: “Interesting times. I’ll keep building for America, regardless.” His comment neither confirmed nor denied the feasibility of Trump’s threat, leaving room for speculation about his next move.

Prominent Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, condemned the proposal as “authoritarian overreach.” In a press conference, Jeffries stated, “Threatening to strip citizenship from critics is not leadership—it’s tyranny. This is a dangerous precedent that undermines the Constitution.” Meanwhile, some Republicans distanced themselves from the remarks, with Senator Mitt Romney calling the idea “reckless and divisive” in a rare critique of Trump.

Broader Implications

The controversy comes at a time when Trump’s second term is already marked by polarizing rhetoric and bold policy proposals. His focus on citizenship revocation taps into broader themes of loyalty and national identity that have defined his political brand. However, targeting high-profile figures like O’Donnell and Musk risks alienating moderates and independents, particularly as Musk remains a polarizing yet influential figure in technology and innovation.

Analysts suggest that Trump’s post may be less about actionable policy and more about rallying his base ahead of upcoming political battles, including potential fights over immigration reform and border security. By framing O’Donnell and Musk as threats, Trump reinforces a narrative of “us vs. them” that resonates with his core supporters.

What’s Next?

As of now, there is no indication that Trump’s proposal will translate into formal policy action. The legal barriers to revoking citizenship, combined with the political fallout, make it unlikely that the administration will pursue such a course. However, the statement has already succeeded in dominating the news cycle, drawing attention away from other policy discussions and reigniting debates about Trump’s leadership style.

For O’Donnell and Musk, the public nature of Trump’s attack may amplify their platforms. O’Donnell has long used her clashes with Trump to fuel her advocacy, while Musk’s response suggests he intends to remain unfazed, focusing on his ventures like SpaceX and Tesla. Meanwhile, the public awaits further clarification from Trump or his administration on whether this was a serious policy proposal or merely another provocative salvo in his ongoing war of words.

As the story develops, all eyes will be on Truth Social and X, where reactions from supporters, detractors, and the individuals themselves are likely to shape the narrative in real time.