NFL
BREAKING: Texas Governor Greg Abbott Discloses Donald Trump’s Directive During his visit to Return and Reject Future Taylor Swift and Dolly Parton’s Donations for Texas Hill Country Flood Relief Efforts

Texas Governor Greg Abbott Claims Trump Directed State to Return and Reject Donations from Taylor Swift and Dolly Parton for Hill Country Flood Relief
July 11, 2025
AUSTIN, TX – In a surprising revelation, Texas Governor Greg Abbott has alleged that former President Donald Trump personally instructed state officials to return and reject charitable donations from music icons Taylor Swift and Dolly Parton intended for flood relief efforts in the Texas Hill Country. The claim, made during a press conference on Friday, has sparked widespread speculation and raised questions about the intersection of politics and philanthropy in disaster recovery.

The Texas Hill Country, a region known for its scenic beauty and vibrant communities, has been grappling with the aftermath of severe flooding that displaced hundreds of residents and caused millions in damages. In response, numerous celebrities, including Swift and Parton, reportedly offered significant financial contributions to aid recovery efforts. However, Governor Abbott’s statement suggests that not all donations are being welcomed by the state.
According to Abbott, Trump contacted state officials earlier this week, urging them to return any funds already received from the two artists and to reject any future contributions. “I received a direct communication from President Trump, who made it clear that Texas should not accept money from Taylor Swift or Dolly Parton for the flood relief efforts,” Abbott said during the press conference. “He believes their involvement could politicize the recovery process, and he’s asked us to focus on other sources of funding.”
The governor did not elaborate on the specific reasons behind Trump’s alleged directive or provide evidence of the communication. Representatives for Swift and Parton have not yet responded to requests for comment, and Trump’s office has remained silent on the matter. The lack of clarity has fueled debate across social media platforms, with some praising the move as a stand against celebrity influence in politics, while others criticize it as a rejection of much-needed aid.
The Texas Hill Country floods, triggered by unprecedented rainfall in late June, left communities like Fredericksburg, Kerrville, and Boerne struggling to rebuild. Local officials estimate that recovery efforts will require tens of millions of dollars to restore infrastructure, support displaced families, and bolster flood prevention systems. Charitable contributions from high-profile figures like Swift and Parton, known for their philanthropy, were seen as a boon for the region.
Taylor Swift, a global pop superstar, has a history of supporting disaster relief efforts, including significant donations for hurricane and flood victims in recent years. Similarly, Dolly Parton, a country music legend, has long been celebrated for her generosity, particularly through her Dollywood Foundation and contributions to wildfire and flood relief in her home state of Tennessee. Their involvement in the Texas Hill Country recovery was expected to bring both financial support and public attention to the crisis.
Abbott’s announcement has drawn sharp criticism from some local leaders and residents. “We’re in desperate need of funds to help families get back on their feet,” said Maria Gonzalez, a city council member in Kerrville. “Turning away donations from anyone, especially people like Taylor Swift and Dolly Parton who want to help, seems counterproductive and frankly baffling.” Others, however, expressed support for the decision, citing concerns about the politicization of relief efforts. “We don’t need Hollywood or music industry agendas muddying the waters,” said Jeff Carter, a local business owner in Fredericksburg.
The alleged directive also raises questions about the influence of political figures on state-level disaster response. Trump, who remains a polarizing figure in Texas politics, has not publicly commented on the matter, leaving observers to speculate about his motivations. Some political analysts suggest the move could be an attempt to distance relief efforts from figures perceived as critical of his political stance, though no direct evidence supports this theory.
Governor Abbott emphasized that Texas remains committed to supporting Hill Country residents, pointing to state and federal funds already allocated for recovery. “We have robust resources in place, and we’re grateful for the generosity of Texans and others who are stepping up,” he said. However, he declined to provide details on the total amount of donations returned or the specific process for rejecting future contributions.
As the story develops, all eyes will be on Austin to see how the state navigates this unusual controversy. For now, the people of the Texas Hill Country continue their recovery, hoping that political disputes will not overshadow their urgent needs.