Donald Trump Demands FBI Investigate Taylor Swift for Money Laundering, Targeting Her $1 Billion WHO Partnership to Deliver Food, Water, and Solar Energy to War-Torn Regions in Iran, Israel, Ukraine, Gaza and Palestine

Trump Calls for FBI Investigation into Taylor Swift Over $1 Billion WHO Collaboration, Alleging Money Laundering

June 25, 2025 – In a stunning escalation of his public feuds, former President Donald Trump has called for the FBI to investigate pop superstar Taylor Swift, accusing her of money laundering through her highly publicized $1 billion collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). The partnership, which aims to provide food, clean water, and solar energy to war victims in Iran, Israel, Ukraine, Gaza, and Palestine, has been hailed by many as a groundbreaking humanitarian effort. However, Trump’s allegations have cast a shadow over the initiative, sparking heated debate and drawing intense media scrutiny.

The Swift-WHO Collaboration: A Historic Humanitarian Push

Announced earlier this month, Taylor Swift’s $1 billion partnership with the WHO has been described as one of the most ambitious celebrity-led humanitarian projects in history. The initiative seeks to address the dire needs of civilians caught in ongoing conflicts across five regions: Iran, Israel, Ukraine, Gaza, and Palestine. The program focuses on three key areas:

• Food Security: Distributing nutrient-rich meals to combat malnutrition in war-torn communities.

• Clean Water Access: Installing water purification systems to ensure safe drinking water.

• Solar Energy Infrastructure: Providing portable solar panels to power medical facilities, schools, and homes in areas with disrupted electricity.

Swift, who has long been an advocate for social causes, described the collaboration as a “call to action” during a viral press conference. “No one should suffer because of war,” she said. “This is about giving people hope, dignity, and the basic resources they need to survive.” The WHO praised Swift’s commitment, noting that her financial contribution and global influence could “save countless lives.”

The initiative has garnered widespread support from fans, world leaders, and humanitarian organizations. Social media platforms, including X, have been flooded with posts celebrating Swift’s efforts, with hashtags like #SwiftSavesLives trending worldwide. However, the project’s high profile and massive budget have also attracted skepticism, culminating in Trump’s explosive claims.

Trump’s Allegations: Money Laundering or Political Vendetta?

Speaking at a rally in Florida on Tuesday evening, Trump accused Swift of using the WHO collaboration as a front for illicit financial activities. “Taylor Swift is making billions, and now she’s got this $1 billion deal with the WHO? Nobody moves that kind of money without something fishy going on,” Trump told the crowd. “I’m calling on the FBI to investigate her for money laundering. We need to know where this money’s really going!”

Trump offered no evidence to support his claims, but his remarks quickly ignited a firestorm of reactions. Supporters at the rally cheered, with some echoing his suspicions about the scale of the project. On X, posts from Trump-aligned accounts amplified the allegations, questioning the transparency of Swift’s financial contributions and the WHO’s oversight of the funds.

Critics, however, dismissed Trump’s accusations as baseless and politically motivated. Many pointed to his history of targeting prominent figures, including Swift, who endorsed Democratic candidates in the 2018 midterms and 2020 presidential election. “This is just Trump lashing out at someone who doesn’t support him,” said political analyst Sarah Collins in a CNN interview. “Swift’s project has been vetted by the WHO and multiple NGOs. There’s no credible evidence of wrongdoing.”

Swift’s Response: Silence Amid the Storm

As of Wednesday evening, Taylor Swift has not publicly responded to Trump’s allegations. Her team issued a brief statement reaffirming their commitment to the WHO initiative: “We remain focused on delivering life-saving aid to those in need. The facts speak for themselves.” The WHO also defended the partnership, stating that all funds are subject to rigorous auditing and oversight to ensure transparency and accountability.

Swift’s silence has not stopped her fans, known as “Swifties,” from rallying to her defense. On X, thousands of users have condemned Trump’s remarks, accusing him of attempting to sabotage a noble cause. “Taylor is out here saving lives, and Trump’s just throwing tantrums,” one user posted. Others have called for boycotts of Trump-related businesses, while some have urged Swift to take legal action against the former president for defamation.

The Broader Context: Celebrity Activism Under Scrutiny

Trump’s allegations come at a time when celebrity-led philanthropy is increasingly scrutinized. While stars like Swift have the resources and platforms to drive significant change, their involvement in global issues often invites skepticism about motives and execution. The sheer scale of Swift’s $1 billion commitment has raised legitimate questions about logistics, even among those who support the project. How will the funds be distributed? Who will oversee the implementation of solar energy systems in volatile regions? These questions, while not evidence of wrongdoing, have provided fodder for skeptics.

Experts in humanitarian aid note that large-scale projects like Swift’s require meticulous planning and coordination. “A $1 billion initiative is unprecedented for an individual donor,” said Dr. Aisha Rahman, a global health consultant. “It’s natural for people to ask questions, but jumping to accusations of money laundering without evidence is reckless.”

What’s Next?

The FBI has not commented on Trump’s call for an investigation, and it remains unclear whether the agency will take any action. Legal experts suggest that without concrete evidence, an investigation is unlikely. “The FBI doesn’t launch probes based on public statements alone,” said former federal prosecutor James Whitaker. “They’d need credible allegations backed by data, which Trump hasn’t provided.”

Meanwhile, Swift’s WHO collaboration continues to move forward. The first phase of the initiative, which includes food and water deliveries to Ukraine and Gaza, is set to begin next month. The WHO has promised regular updates on the project’s progress, aiming to maintain public trust amid the controversy.

For Trump, the attack on Swift appears to be part of a broader strategy to dominate headlines and rally his base. Whether his allegations gain traction or fizzle out remains to be seen, but they have undeniably thrust Swift’s humanitarian efforts into an unexpected political spotlight.

As the world watches, one thing is clear: Taylor Swift’s attempt to make a difference has sparked a conversation that extends far beyond the stage, touching on issues of trust, power, and the role of celebrity in a divided world.