President Trump Issues Executive Order Banning the Planned ‘No Kings Day’ Rally on October 18, Citing National Security Risks — Warns Taylor Swift to Revoke Her $1 Million Donation to Organizers stating she’s ’FUNDING CHAOS’

Trump Orders ‘No Kings Day’ Rally to Be Canceled, Citing National Security Concerns — Warns Taylor Swift to Withdraw $1 Million Donation

Washington, D.C. — October 17, 2025

President Donald Trump has issued an executive order prohibiting the planned “No Kings Day” rally scheduled for October 18, citing what he described as “credible threats to national security and public order.” The decision comes just days after pop star Taylor Swift donated $1 million to organizers of the event to fund food, water, medical supplies, protective gear, and other essentials for participants.

In a statement released late Thursday, the White House said the order was “necessary to ensure the safety of the American people” and to prevent “activities that may destabilize or endanger the functioning of the government.” The order directs federal and local law enforcement agencies to coordinate in preventing the demonstration from taking place.

“The United States will not permit any movement, protest, or gathering that undermines the peace and security of the nation,” the statement read. “All parties involved, including public figures, are urged to act responsibly and refrain from supporting actions that could jeopardize national stability.”

Swift’s Donation Draws Presidential Warning

Taylor Swift’s $1 million contribution to the protest organizers, confirmed earlier this week, has become a central point of contention in the administration’s decision. According to reports, the donation was intended to support logistical and humanitarian needs for demonstrators — including portable chargers, sign-making materials, and first aid kits.

President Trump, in remarks to reporters Friday morning, directly addressed the singer’s involvement, warning her to “reconsider” her financial support.

“Ms. Swift is a talented person,” Trump said. “But donating large sums to groups planning potentially unlawful gatherings is irresponsible. She should revoke that money immediately. We cannot allow celebrity influence to override the rule of law.”

The “No Kings Day” rally was initially organized as a peaceful, symbolic protest calling for democratic accountability and limits on executive power. Organizers described it as a “nonpartisan day of reflection against political entitlement.”

However, administration officials argued that intelligence reports suggested potential infiltration by “disruptive and extremist” groups that could lead to violent confrontations.

Civil Liberties Groups Condemn the Move

The order has drawn sharp criticism from civil rights advocates, who accused the administration of suppressing free speech and peaceful assembly. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said in a statement that “the right to protest is fundamental to democracy” and vowed to challenge the executive order in court.

“This administration continues to weaponize the concept of national security to silence dissent,” the ACLU’s statement read. “Preventing a peaceful demonstration under the guise of safety sets a dangerous precedent.”

Representatives for Taylor Swift declined to comment directly on the president’s remarks but reiterated that her donation was “strictly humanitarian in nature” and “not intended to support or incite any unlawful activity.”

A Growing Divide Between Politics and Pop Culture

The confrontation underscores a deepening rift between the Trump administration and cultural figures who have become increasingly vocal on political and social issues. Swift, who has previously spoken out on voting rights, reproductive freedom, and government transparency, has emerged as one of the most politically active entertainers in the country.

Political analysts say the dispute reflects the broader polarization between the administration and public figures who use their platforms to advocate for social change.

“We’re seeing the intersection of celebrity influence and political authority clash in real time,” said Dr. Alana Perez, a political communications expert at Georgetown University. “The symbolism of this confrontation — a popular artist advocating civic engagement versus a president invoking national security — is powerful and deeply polarizing.”