The Department of Justice is investigating Minnesota officials and Donald Trump Order to invoke the Insurrection Act due to ongoing unrest after ICE agents were Attacked

DOJ Investigates Minnesota Officials as Trump Threatens Insurrection Act During ICE‑Related Unrest

MINNEAPOLIS — The U.S. Department of Justice has launched a criminal investigation into Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey over accusations they may have impeded federal immigration enforcement, escalating a bitter conflict between the state’s leaders and the federal government. 

The inquiry focuses on whether comments and actions by Walz and Frey hindered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal agents deployed to Minneapolis and surrounding areas as part of a broader crackdown. Both officials have publicly condemned the massive surge of federal agents, saying it has worsened tensions and raised safety concerns in their communities. 

Context of Unrest

The probe comes against a backdrop of ongoing protests and clashes that began after an ICE agent fatally shot a 37‑year‑old Minnesota resident, prompting widespread criticism of the federal operation’s tactics. Thousands of ICE and Border Patrol officers were sent to the state in recent weeks under what has been described as Operation Metro Surge, leading to daily demonstrations and tense encounters with federal forces. 

At times, protests have turned confrontational, with some demonstrators clashing with immigration agents in the streets of Minneapolis. These ongoing tensions have drawn national attention and deepened divides between local and federal authorities. 

Threat of Insurrection Act Invocation

In response to the unrest, former President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 — a rarely used federal law that would allow him to deploy active‑duty military forces inside the United States to suppress civil disorder. Trump’s comments were made amid continuing demonstrations and accusations that Minnesota’s leadership was not doing enough to control the situation. 

Legal experts and some lawmakers argue that conditions in Minnesota do not meet the legal threshold required for the act’s use, which historically has applied to much larger or more clearly defined insurrections. Still, Trump stressed his willingness to use the law if he believed federal officers needed protection or order could not be restored by other means. 

Reactions from State Officials

Governor Walz and Mayor Frey have denounced the DOJ investigation as a political intimidation tactic, saying federal authorities are targeting them for criticizing the immigration surge. Walz stated that federal enforcement actions have endangered residents and that subpoenaing state leaders sets a dangerous precedent. Frey called the investigation an attempt to frighten local officials into silence as they defend their communities. 

Local leaders have also pointed to recent federal court rulings that restrict how immigration officers can engage with peaceful protesters, emphasizing constitutional protections even amid broader enforcement efforts. 

National Debate Intensifies

The situation in Minnesota has triggered debate on Capitol Hill and among legal scholars about federal authority, states’ rights, and civil liberties. Some congressional Republicans have urged caution, arguing that military intervention on U.S. soil should be a last resort, while Democrats have sharply criticized the federal response and called for accountability for federal agents’ actions that sparked the unrest. 

As the investigation continues and protests persist, officials on all sides face increasing pressure to navigate a politically and legally complex crisis with far‑reaching implications for federal‑state relations and civil rights.