Ariana Grande Sues Donald Trump for $500 Million Over Alleged Unauthorized Use of Song in ICE Video

Pop superstar Ariana Grande has reportedly filed a staggering $500 million lawsuit against President Donald Trump and his campaign affiliates, alleging that one of her hit songs was used without permission in a controversial video promoting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations.

According to court documents filed in federal court, Grande claims that the unauthorized use of her music in the video constituted copyright infringement and falsely suggested that she endorsed the message and policies portrayed in the footage.

The singer, who has frequently spoken out on immigration and human rights issues, sharply condemned the video, describing it as “barbaric, inhumane, and heinous.” In a statement released through her legal team, Grande said she was “outraged” to discover that her music had been paired with imagery depicting immigration raids and detentions.

“My music was created to inspire love, hope, and unity,” the statement read. “It should never be used to promote policies or actions that I believe cause harm to vulnerable families and communities.”

The lawsuit seeks $500 million in damages, claiming both financial harm and reputational damage. Grande’s attorneys argue that the use of her song could mislead fans into believing she supports the political messaging presented in the video.

The controversial video, which quickly circulated online, reportedly highlighted recent ICE enforcement actions and featured patriotic imagery alongside Grande’s music. Critics accused the production of exploiting popular culture to advance a divisive political agenda.

Trump allies dismissed the lawsuit as politically motivated and vowed to challenge the claims in court. Representatives for the president argued that the matter would be vigorously contested and maintained that the video was protected under various legal doctrines.

The dispute has reignited a long-running battle between politicians and artists over the use of copyrighted music at political events and in campaign materials. Numerous musicians in recent years have objected to their songs being used in political contexts without their consent.

Legal experts say the case could become one of the most closely watched copyright battles involving a major recording artist and a sitting president. If successful, Grande’s lawsuit could set a significant precedent regarding the use of commercial music in political messaging.

As public debate intensifies, supporters of both figures have flooded social media with reactions, turning the legal showdown into one of the most talked-about political and entertainment stories of the year.